Business groups brand UK's quarantine plan for arrivals 'isolationist'

Business groups have accused the government of
pursuing an “isolationist” policy after the home secretary, Priti Patel,
confirmed that arrivals in the UK will have to quarantine themselves for a
fortnight or face a £1,000 fine.
From 8 June, almost everyone arriving at ports and
airports, including UK citizens, will be required to travel directly to an
address they provide to the authorities, where they must then self-isolate for
a fortnight. The French interior ministry expressed its “regret” that it would
not be exempt from the quarantine plan, after assurances this month that the
country would be.
Anyone failing to comply could face a fine of
£1,000. Patel said: “I fully expect the majority of people will do the right
thing and abide by these measures. But we will take enforcement action against
the minority of people who endanger the safety of others.”
Patel defended the stringent new measures at the
Downing Street press conference on Friday. “We are not closing our borders, and
I think people should recognise that,” she said.
But business groups have reacted furiously, saying
ministers should instead have taken a more targeted approach – and sought
international agreements that could have allowed some restrictions to be
waived.
A spokesperson for Abta, which represents travel
agents and tour operators, said: “Protecting public health is a priority and
it’s vital to base decisions about travel on the best health and scientific
advice. No one should be in any doubt, however, that a 14-day quarantine period
for all travellers returning to the UK will unavoidably put many people off
travelling abroad or visiting the UK, and will therefore have a hugely damaging
impact on the UK inbound and outbound tourism industries – which support
hundreds of thousands of jobs in this country and have already been severely
affected by the pandemic.
“It’s
therefore critical that the government regularly reviews this policy –
including assessing its effectiveness and how it works with other control
measures. We’d also continue to urge the government to keep any measures
proportionate, targeted and limited only to what is necessary and to seek a
coordinated approach with destinations in the EU and beyond.”
The stringent new quarantine system will be reviewed
every three weeks. The government confirmed there will be exemptions for
freight drivers; doctors and scientists working on the pandemic; and fruit
pickers, who will be expected to confine themselves to the farms where they
work. Visitors from Ireland will also be exempt.
Stephen Phipson, chief executive of Make UK, said:
“Industry will be disappointed with this measure which is isolationist and will
prevent many essential daily cross-border journeys to provide service and
maintenance. Additionally air freight on passenger aircraft provides a
significant proportion of UK export and supply chain capacity, all of which is
vital to operations as companies begin to get up and running.”
Adam Tyndall, programme director of the business
lobbying group London First, said: “Deciding to quarantine all passengers
arriving into the UK is an indiscriminate response to an increasingly nuanced
situation. Two weeks in isolation will put off most travellers, all of whom
would have contributed to the UK’s economic recovery.
“The UK is a world leader in aviation and should be
forging international agreements between low-risk countries.”
Kate Nicholls, chief executive of UK Hospitality,
said: “The imposition of a quarantine period will inevitably damage
international visitor travel, and the longer it is in place, the more damage it
will wreak.”
The government has not ruled out negotiating “air
bridges” – an idea championed by the transport secretary, Grant Shapps. The UK
would seek to strike bilateral agreements with countries with low incidence of
Covid-19 under which quarantine restrictions could be waived. “France is ready
to put in place a reciprocal scheme once the system comes into force on the
British side,” the French interior ministry said in a statement.
But Patel made clear such plans were not imminent.
“I think we should be absolutely open to all ideas. This is not for today, but
this doesn’t mean we should rule this out in the future. We will look at all
options,” she said.
Authorities will carry out spot checks to ensure the
new rules are being complied with – using details supplied by travellers on a
dedicated form. Failure to provide one will result in a £100 fine.
New arrivals will also be encouraged to download the
contact tracing app, once it is available.
The regime will be in place across the UK, though
the devolved administrations are expected to publish details of how they will
implement it.
The move rekindled the debate about why ministers
did not restrict travel from areas affected by coronavirus much earlier in the
outbreak.
Papers published by the Sage group of scientific
experts on Friday showed that its modelling group SPI-M-O suggested on 3
February that restricting travel from badly hit areas, including China, could
delay the onset of the disease in the UK by up to a fortnight.
“Based on current information on doubling times from
China, the average delay expected to result from a 90% reduction of travel from
China may be up to two weeks,” the experts said at the time.
They cautioned that preventing direct arrivals from
China alone would have had a smaller impact, because of the risk of infected
people coming via third countries.
The shadow foreign secretary, Lisa Nandy, said the
measures were “long overdue”.
But she said they were not a long-term solution. “If
you’re asking people voluntarily to self-isolate for two weeks when they don’t
have any symptoms and there’s pressure to go to work or they lose their jobs –
it’s hard for people to know what to do.”
She suggested that once the government’s track and
trace system is in place, the restrictions could potentially be loosened “If
they have got a world-beating test, track and trace system up and running they
can test people when they get off and then at that stage you could see a
scenario at which point quarantine measures become redundant,” she said.
Government messaging over the quarantine had been
frustrating, Nandy said, with seven occasions in which announcements relating
to the policy had been made by a minister or briefed to newspapers and then
dropped or rowed back from within the last month.
She said the fact that the government had applied
quarantine measures to only a handful of flights earlier in the crisis was
“completely incoherent and inconsistent”.