Joko Widodo between a rock and a hard place over terrorist Abu Bakar Bashir's release

Indonesian President Joko Widodo appears to have
backed away from plans to offer early release from jail to the alleged
mastermind of the Bali bombings, Abu Bakar Bashir, after a public backlash at
home and in countries including Australia.
Less than a week ago, the Indonesian leader
indicated the militant Islamic cleric would walk free as early as today — years
before his sentence expires — without any conditions on his release.
Under Indonesian law Bashir, who was sentenced to 15
years for terror-related activities, must declare a pledge of loyalty to the
state, or formally appeal to the President for clemency, to be eligible for
release.
Bashir has consistently refused to do either.
President Widodo justified his decision to release
Bashir on humanitarian grounds, citing his old age and frail health.
But after a public backlash, including strong
objections from Australia, Indonesia announced a review of the decision.
And now Mr Widodo — or Jokowi, as he is popularly
known — has declared the firebrand cleric will not be freed unless he meets the
legal conditions.
Caught between a rock and a hard place
The President's apparent backdown makes it far less
likely Bashir will be freed at all.
And it highlights the political dilemma Jokowi faces
as he seeks a second presidential term at national elections in April.
Despite opinion polls that put him clearly in front,
the President faces formidable opposition from hard-line Islamic parties that
have sought to undermine his own Muslim credentials.
So, when the Indonesian leader announced Bashir was
in line for release, he no doubt hoped it would appeal to conservative Islamic
voters in a country increasingly divided on religious grounds.
No grounds for release
Bashir has served only nine years of an original
15-year sentence for terrorism, after he was convicted of organising a jihadist
training camp in Aceh.
But now 81, he is reported to be frail and in ill
health.
His son Abdulrohim Bashir said Bashir had painful
osteoarthritis and swollen veins requiring medical attention that was not
available in prison.
Strictly speaking, there are no legal grounds for
his release.
And the angry backlash to Jokowi's decision appears
to have taken the President by surprise.
By Monday his Government had announced a review of
Bashir's suitability for release.
Not-so-hidden motive
Given the timing — three months out from the
election — it is difficult not to see the decision as politically motivated.
"We know that Joko Widodo is deeply anxious at
the possibility of Islam being used against him," said Greg Fealy, an
Associate Professor in Indonesian politics at the Australian National
University.
"He is under pressure for supposedly using
criminal sanctions against Islamic scholars.
"It is clear from statements by people on his
team that they are portraying the release of Abu Bakar Bashir as proof that he
really has the interests of Islamic scholars at heart.
The fact that he seems to have done this in a
legally questionable way would just deepen their suspicion that he's doing this
for his own political benefit, rather than for concern for an ageing Islamic
scholar, albeit a convicted terrorist."
Experts said it was not even certain that Mr Widodo
would gain any political mileage from the militant cleric's early release,
given even hard-line groups have also criticised the decision.
"I don't think Joko wins a single point from
the hard-line Islamists," said terrorism expert Sidney Jones, director of
the Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict, in Jakarta.
"Joko is pandering to that element and wants to
get that vote.
"But they're not buying into any of the
strategies that he has embarked upon to try and win them over."
Indeed, Dr Jones questioned whether Bashir was even
sick.
"He isn't suffering from any critical
emergency," she said.
"He looks pretty strong actually.
"If he needed release on humanitarian grounds,
why didn't the President grant his release when petitions were submitted a year
and a half ago?
"Why wait till just a few months before the
election, and why not wait till after the election if there isn't an
emergency?"
Dr Jones said the decision appeared to have been
based on bad advice from presidential legal adviser Yusril Izha Mahendra, who
for more than a decade was also an adviser to Bashir.
"Maybe part of the problem is that his own team
is in such disarray that he didn't hear opposing voices, or didn't seek to
consult with other voices," she said.
Accusations he acted out of political expediency
have led to comparisons with Australia's Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who
endured sharp criticism over his announcement ahead of last year's Wentworth
by-election that Australia's embassy in Israel might be moved to Jerusalem.
Indonesian government ministers were among many
critics who attacked the Australian leader's decision as rash and politically
motivated.
Where Mr Morrison was accused of pandering to Jewish
voters, Mr Widodo is wooing Islamists ahead of an election where religious
divisions could decide the outcome.
"Has Jokowi just done a ScoMo?" tweeted
Ross Taylor, president of Australia's Indonesia Institute.
Little surprise then if Mr Widodo ignores Mr
Morrison's criticism of Bashir's possible release, in the same way that
Australia warned against Indonesian interference on the embassy decision.
A commentary piece in the Jakarta Post accused
Jokowi of double standards on the issue, urging the President to "listen
to the tearful protests of the families of those butchered by the terrorists in
Bali and in other places in Indonesia".
Mr Morrison has warned Australia will protest if
Bashir is released early, urging Indonesia to show respect for the victims of
the 2002 Bali nightclub bombings that killed 88 Australians.
Bashir's son has said his father has long been
misunderstood and deserves to be released.
"He cannot be linked to terrorism," he
said.
"What he did was to preach Islamic values to
people.
"Some of his students committed terrorism.