At five in the afternoon, Cairo time (38).. France’s Decision Against the Muslim Brotherhood... The Beginning of a New European Phase to Dismantle the Organization (3)
How Did the Muslim Brotherhood
Infiltrate France?
In a shocking 76-page report
released in May 2025, prepared by two senior French officials at the request of
the then French Minister of the Interior, Bruno Retailleau—currently the leader
of the Gaullist Republicans Party—the information and figures concerning the
infiltration of France by the Muslim Brotherhood organization proved startling.
According to the figures
contained in the report, (139) mosques were classified as being linked to the
Muslim Brotherhood, while (86) others were considered closely associated with
the group, across more than (55) administrative districts.
The report considered that
average attendance at these organization-affiliated mosques reaches (91,000)
worshippers every Friday.
It also stated that the
information collected indicates that (280) associations linked to the
organization operate across several sectors: religious, charitable,
educational, professional, youth-related, and financial.
The report also targeted schools
affiliated with the organization, identifying links between (21) institutions
and the Muslim Brotherhood, which are hosting (4,200) students this year,
referring to the (2025–2026) academic year.
The report submitted by the
Élysée Palace, titled “The Muslim Brotherhood and Political Islam in France,”
and discussed during a meeting of the National Defense and Security Council on
Wednesday, 21 May 2025, was regarded as the third phase of the war against
extremist Islamic thought—a war launched by President Emmanuel Macron since his
first election in (2017).
This followed the adoption of the
Law to Strengthen Internal Security and Combat Terrorism in (2017), and the
enactment of the Law to Strengthen Respect for Republican Values, introduced in
(2021), known as the “Anti-Separatism Law.”
At the outset of the report, a
preamble affirmed that the time had come to combat “Islamist infiltration” led
by the Muslim Brotherhood. This movement, founded in Egypt in (1928), adopted
tactics of “camouflage” with the aim of “seizing the institutions of power” in
the French Republic “from below”—through “associations and municipalities”—in
order to better impose the rules of life determined by Islamic law on France
from within.
The Élysée explained that the
report “aims to raise awareness of this threat among the general public and
locally elected officials ahead of the 2026 municipal elections, and to better
define and document the threat in order to prevent it entirely.”
In practical terms, Interior
Minister Bruno Retailleau was unable to ban the Muslim Brotherhood, “but he
intended, according to this report, to strike them in their financial
resources” by freezing assets, strengthening oversight of endowment funds that fuel
the movement, and preventing targeted associations from transferring their
properties and assets abroad prior to their dissolution—just as the association
“Baraka City” had done when it transferred its funds to a British structure
before the report’s release.
On the financial level, the
report identified approximately fifteen suspicious funds supporting the
financing of “separatist initiatives,” with some of these funds being used to
finance the organization’s activities in France.
The official report stated that
the Muslim Brotherhood constitutes “a threat to national cohesion.” The two
authors of the report—a former ambassador and a prefect—speak of “intervention
from below” by the Muslim Brotherhood, particularly in three sectors: national
education, higher education, and sports. This prompted French President
Emmanuel Macron to call on the government to present “new proposals” in light
of the “seriousness of the facts,” to strengthen the battle against the alleged
infiltration of Islamist Brotherhood elements into French society.
The Beginnings:
The report traces the origins of
the organization’s infiltration of Europe, stating that:
The Muslim Brotherhood
infiltrated Europe through migration movements beginning in the (1950s),
following clashes with governments in Middle Eastern countries. This initial
establishment formed the foundation for developing the migration of a new
generation of Islamist radicals who entered European universities.
Thus, the first nucleus of the
Muslim Brotherhood from the Middle East settled in Britain, Germany, and
Switzerland starting in the (1950s), before moving to Belgium, France, and
Italy. The leaders—mostly belonging to the educated, urban middle class—were
concentrated in certain strategic cities such as Aachen or London, where they
formed a “pious bourgeoisie.”
The Infiltration of France:
In France, a religious awareness
emerged in the (1950s) among Muslim migrant workers, particularly around the
figure of the Indian scholar and political refugee Muhammad Hamidullah, who
delivered sermons at the Da‘wa Mosque located on Rue de Tanger in Paris. Under
his leadership, the Association of Islamic Students in France (AEIF) was
founded in (1963).
At the same time, Said Ramadan,
the son-in-law of Hassan al-Banna, the founder of the Brotherhood, migrated and
settled in Switzerland, where he founded the Islamic Center of Geneva in (1961)
with support from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This center quickly became
closely aligned with the emerging French Islamic Union in France, and ties
between them developed rapidly.
The formation of the movement in
France continued over the following decade, with contributions from two Syrian
and Egyptian currents. Two students who arrived in the early (1980s), both
scholars of religious sciences, succeeded in unifying them: the Lebanese Faisal
Mawlawi and the Tunisian Ahmed Jaballah. Both were identified as direct envoys
of the Muslim Brotherhood and are considered among the most important figures
of the Union of Islamic Organizations in France, founded in (1983).
Based on a political ideology
that was Westernized in order to be implanted in Europe, the system of
political Islam promoted by the Muslim Brotherhood combines the adaptation of
Middle Eastern traditions with the prevailing traditions of the target countries
of infiltration, alongside a tactical concealment of core ideas and the
fundamental vision under the logic of taqiyya.
It appears that the religious
tolerance practiced by the Muslim Brotherhood from this standpoint served
political objectives and poorly concealed its real inability to conceive of the
other within a secular society.
In France, for example,
Islamic-Christian dialogue, when it includes representatives of the Muslim
Brotherhood, appears laden with pretense.
This was, in reality, a tactical
choice by the Union of Islamic Organizations of France in its pursuit of
legitimacy with public authorities. The real test came in the (1990s), as
demonstrated in academic literature, in the Association of Muslims in Gironde.
In that literature, religious
superiority is evident, along with contempt for the religiously different
other—an attitude that is ultimately taught in Brotherhood schools accredited
by the French government.
Brotherhood Fatwas:
For this reason, French
society—especially intellectuals, politicians, and parliamentarians—was greatly
surprised when the book “The Satanic Ideas” was published. It contained a
number of fatwas included in Al-Da‘wa magazine, the official mouthpiece of the
organization during the (1970s) and (1980s), particularly regarding the
religiously different other. These fatwas stated that such an other has no
right to build places of worship in Muslim lands, nor the right to be buried in
Muslim cemeteries—an issue that astonished everyone, especially given that
representatives of the organization were constantly appearing on camera in
meetings bringing them together with leaders of Christian or Jewish
institutions.
Tomorrow, we continue with the
report that described how the Muslim Brotherhood organization infiltrated—like
an octopus with multiple arms—France’s social, political, and financial
institutions.
Paris: 5:00 p.m. Cairo time.





